Assuring VAGO's quality
The quality of our reports is assessed
through internal and external quality assurance reviews and
feedback from Parliament and audit clients.
EXTERNAL ASSESSMENT OF REPORTS
Each year VAGO has a selection of its Performance Audit reports
assessed by three independent, professional reviewers. The process
and criteria are coordinated through the Australasian Council of
Auditors-General. The criteria that the reports are assessed
against are:
- scope and potential for significant impact
- focus on effectiveness, efficiency, economy
- persuasiveness of conclusions
- communication – printed report
- communication – online report
- usefulness to Parliament.
An overall score is calculated based on
the average score for each criterion. VAGO uses the average of the
overall scores for the reports assessed as a performance measure
with a target of 80 per cent. In 2010–11 the overall score was 80
per cent. This is on par with results in previous years of 81 per
cent (2009–10) and 79 per cent (2008–09).
Please click for more information.
PARLIAMENTARIAN AND AUDIT CLIENT SURVEYS
Parliamentarians are surveyed on the
usefulness of VAGO reports and their level of satisfaction with
VAGO services. VAGO’s audit client survey program provides the
opportunity for feedback on the process, reporting and value of the
audit they were involved in and its outcomes.
The information from these surveys is used by VAGO to:
- identify and address issues arising out of individual
audits
- monitor trends and common themes
- trigger improvement projects and strategies as well as monitor
the effectiveness of current improvement projects.
To collect this feedback, Parliamentarians are surveyed
annually while audit clients are surveyed shortly after the audit
has been completed.
Who is surveyed?
Parliamentarians
All Victorian
Parliamentarians are invited to complete a survey. The
questionnaire is comprehensive and seeks feedback on Financial
Audit reports, Performance Audit reports and the Parliamentarians'
dealings with VAGO throughout the year.
Financial audit
Audit clients are surveyed as close as possible to the completion
of their audit.
Performance audit
When a report is tabled, those involved in the audit are invited to
participate in a survey. The survey contact is usually the most
senior executive with direct line responsibility for the area
audited.
The survey process
VAGO has engaged an accredited independent research company
to conduct the surveys and to collate the results. This allows for
impartial data collection and interviewing. Participants may elect
to keep their feedback confidential, which means that VAGO does not
see their completed questionnaire (or individual score) but the
qualitative feedback is consolidated at the end of financial
year.
2010–11 survey results
Parliamentarians
Overall, 98 per cent of Parliamentarian respondents are satisfied
or very satisfied with the Auditor-General’s reports and services.
This is an increase from 92 per cent in 2008–09 and 2009–10.
Please click for more information.
Audit clients
Feedback is sought on three areas – audit process, audit reporting
and the value of the audit. An overall score is calculated based on
the average of the three areas.
Financial audit
In 2010–11 the average score for financial audit was
76.7 out of a possible 100. This is an increase on the result in
2009–10 of 75.5.
|
|
Process |
Reporting |
Value |
Overall |
|
2010–11 |
79.5 |
78.0 |
72.7 |
76.7
|
| 2009–10 |
76.8 |
76.4 |
73.2 |
75.5 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Please click for more
information.
Performance audit
In 2010–11 the average score for performance audit was
66.6 out of 100. This is slightly lower than the result in
2009–10 of 68.5.
| |
Process |
Reporting |
Value |
Overall |
|
2010–11 |
68.1 |
66.9 |
64.9 |
66.6
|
| 2009–10 |
70.3 |
67.5 |
67.8 |
68.5 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Please click for more
information.
Please send any questions or feedback to surveys@audit.vic.gov.au.