Appendix H. Spend and benefits
Figures H1 and H2 show spend and benefits for 2012–13 to 2016–17 reported by lead agencies DTF and DPC across all SPCs they lead.
Figure H1
DTF spend and benefits, 2012–13 to 2016–17
Appendix G. Goods and services spend by ANZSIC subdivision, group and class categories
Figures G1 to G3 provide a breakdown of goods and services spend by the seven department by ANZSIC subdivision, group and class categories for 2016–17.
Figure G1
Goods and services spend of more than $5 million by ANZSIC subdivision categories, 2016–17
|
Subdivision categories |
|---|
Appendix F. ANZSIC division descriptions
Figure F1 provides ANZSIC division descriptions.
Figure F1
ANZSIC division descriptions
|
Division |
Descriptions |
|
|---|---|---|
|
A |
Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing | |
Appendix E. Methodology for spend analysis
Step 1: Define scope
The scope of data for the audit included expenditure from the seven departments for the financial years 2014–15, 2015–16 and 2016–17.
We used this expenditure data to perform the following tests:
Appendix D. Western Australian Department of Finance dashboard
Figures D1 and D2 provide examples of the type of information publicly available in the WA Department of Finance dashboard.
Figure D1
WA agency expenditure by the United Nations Standard Products and Services Code, 2016–17
Appendix C. State Purchase Contracts
Figure C1 shows SPCs as at June 2017 and their sourcing arrangements.
Figure C1
SPCs as at 30 June 2017
|
SPC |
Goods and services provided |
Sourcing arrangement |
|---|---|---|
|
DTF |
||
|
Cash and Banking Services | ||
Appendix B. Entities bound by VGPB policies
As at the 1 July 2018 the following entities are bound by VGPB policies.
Appendix A. Audit Act 1994 section 16—submissions and comments
We have consulted with Cenitex, DEDJTR, DET, DELWP, DHHS, DJR, DPC, DTF and VGPB, and we considered their views when reaching our audit conclusions. As required by section 16(3) of the Audit Act 1994, we gave a draft copy of this report, or relevant extracts, to those agencies and asked for their submissions and comments.
Responsibility for the accuracy, fairness and balance of those comments rests solely with the agency head.
Responses were received as follows:
5 Understanding and managing contract leakage
The Standing Directions of the Minister for Finance under the FMA require effective controls over procurement so that specified public sector agencies comply with government supply policies. All departments and entities bound by VGPB policies must purchase from mandatory SPCs unless the lead agency has granted a written exemption.
4 Realisation of SPC benefits
Tracking and reporting SPC benefits is a key part of measuring the performance of an SPC. Lead agencies should be able to show whether SPCs are delivering the expected benefits.
This part examines whether effective arrangements are in place to monitor and evaluate the achievement of expected savings and benefits from SPCs.
4.1 Conclusion
Lead agencies report that SPCs deliver significant financial benefits. However, without individual targets for each SPC to measure these reported benefits against, it is difficult to determine if they represent value for money.