Significant accounting developments (February 2026)
2026–1 | 10 February 2026
Learn about the latest financial reporting developments and our guidance on how to respond.
Download a PDF copy of the article
In this alert
1 | Amendments to the Financial Management Act 1994 |
2 | Key developments in climate reporting |
3 | Responding to AASB 13 Fair Value Measurement amendments |
4 | Preparing for AASB 17 Insurance Contracts |
Update 1: Amendments to the Financial Management Act 1994
Overview and objective of the amendments
In the 2024–25 state Budget, the government announced a plan to introduce financial management reforms, including a review of the Financial Management Act 1994 (the Act). On 19 August 2025, Parliament passed the amendments to the Act, and the legislation subsequently received royal assent.
The government stated that these amendments strengthen the Act to ensure it meet the needs of a growing and increasingly complex public sector. In the context of ongoing economic uncertainty, the reforms aim to improve transparency, accountability and performance in managing and reporting the use of public resources.
As it relates to financial management, the legislation introduces amendments that the government believes will strengthen financial management practices. These include:
- requiring every department and public sector entity to operate within its approved budget
- mandating written notification to Department of Treasury and Finance (DTF) if a department or public sector entity expects to exceed its budget
- elevating responsibilities from the Standing Directions 2018 under the Financial Management Act 1994 into legislation for key roles in departments and public sector entities, including the accountable officer, responsible body, and chief finance officer
- assigning explicit duties to these roles to manage financial responsibilities, provide accurate financial information and report material risks.
These reforms represent a positive step towards strengthening financial management across departments and public sector entities.
What VAGO plans to do and what we recommend
We are currently developing a short learning resource to help you familiarise yourself with the recent legislative changes and why they matter.
We will make the module available on the VAGO website in early 2026 and will notify stakeholders once it is released.
Update 2: Key developments in climate reporting in full revaluation year in 2024–25
Key message
Although there have been some recent developments in climate reporting standard setting (summarised in Appendix A), there has been no further progress on mandatory climate reporting requirements for Victorian public sector entities. This aligns with what we previously outlined in our Tech alert: 2024–2. The current position is summarised below:
| Entity type | Current position |
|---|---|
Corporation Act entities
|
|
Entities governed by the Financial Management Act and other state controlled entities
|
DTF advise significant updates will be shared as this work progresses, with major developments expected in 2026.
|
| Local councils |
LGV advise they will consult with the sector before they make any changes to the reporting requirements or make best practice enhancements. |
| Universities |
|
Other not-for-profit entities (e.g., ACNC-registered organisations such as aged-care providers
|
|
What we recommend
We continue to monitor developments in climate and broader sustainability reporting to understand future impacts on public sector reporting obligations and help support our audit entities.
Since there have been no significant changes in the regulatory environment since our last Technical Alert, our previous recommendations remain current:
- For Corporations Act entities: conduct ongoing assessments to determine whether mandatory climate reporting requirements apply, in order to maintain compliance. Entities should also contact their regulator, if clarification or support is required.
- For entities not currently affected by the Corporations Act amendments: await further guidance from your regulator before undertaking any climate reporting-related activities.
Update 3: Responding to AASB 13 Fair Value Measurement amendments
AASB 13 Fair Value Measurement amendments
In our last Tech alert: 2024–2, we provided an update regarding the revised FRD 103, which allowed a phased approach to adopting the AASB 13 amendments.
As per this phased approach, DTF has allowed entities to apply the amendments relating to the ‘development of unobservable inputs’ and the ‘application of the cost approach’ in their next scheduled revaluation or interim revaluation year (whichever occurs earlier). Please refer to Tech alert: 2024–2 for full details and the steps entities can undertake to conduct impact assessments.
What we recommend
For entities with revaluation requirements as at 30 June 2026, a key audit focus will be on non-financial asset valuation and the applicability of the AASB 13 amendments. We expect these entities to have already begun planning for implementation.
For entities with revaluation years beyond June 2026, the revised FRD 103 provides immediate relief. However, we encourage these entities, especially those with complex assets valued under the current replacement cost approach, to start preparing for the amendments well ahead of the next revaluation cycle. Our experience from the 2025 financial reporting period shows that both financial report preparers and auditors will need to invest significant time and effort to navigate these associated changes.
Update 4: Preparing for AASB 17 Insurance Contracts
Latest developments in AASB 17
AASB 17 applies to public sector entities for reporting periods starting on or after 1 July 2026, replacing AASB 4, AASB 1023 and AASB 1038. The standard should be read together with AASB 2022-9 Insurance Contracts in the Public Sector.
AASB 17 sets out a comprehensive framework for accounting for insurance contracts, covering recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure. This helps financial report users understand an insurer’s exposure, profitability and financial position, and supports better comparability across similar entities.
A key feature of AASB 17 is that it applies not only to traditional insurance contracts but also to ’insurance-like’ arrangements. This means that entities beyond conventional insurers may fall within its scope.
Examples of arrangements that may be affected by AASB 17 include schemes that cover things like liability claims, property damage, building defects or incomplete construction, workers’ compensation, compulsory third-party motor insurance for serious injuries etc.
In the past, entities may have accounted for some of these arrangements as insurance under AASB 1023 General Insurance Contracts, while they may have recognised others as provisions under AASB 137 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets. Depending on their specific features and terms, some arrangements may now fall within the scope of AASB 17.
VAGO guidance to help with scope assessment
To assist public sector entities in assessing whether arrangements fall within the scope of AASB 17, VAGO has developed the Guidance for Public Sector Entities – AASB 17 Insurance Contracts.
The guidance supports a structured and consistent approach to scope assessment and recognises that AASB 17 applies not only to traditional insurance contracts, but also to certain insurance-like arrangements commonly encountered in the public sector.
The guidance includes examples, highlights areas requiring significant judgement, and draws on the standard setters’ discussions to explain the intent behind the requirements, supporting well-informed and consistent application by entities.
What we recommend
The impact of AASB 17 will vary depending on an entity’s specific facts and circumstances. Applying the public sector scoping guidance is expected to involve judgement and, in some cases, discussion between finance teams, DTF and other stakeholders, including auditors, particularly where arrangements are complex or less clear-cut.
To support a structured and consistent approach to scope assessment, entities can undertake the recommended actions outlined below:
| Recommended action | Steps |
|---|---|
Understand the scoping framework
|
|
Identify relevant arrangements and assess the risk transfer
|
|
Documentation of judgements and stakeholder engagement
|
|
Timing considerations
|
|
