Appendix C. Scope of this audit
| Who we audited | What we assessed | What the audit cost |
|---|---|---|
|
We assessed whether councils are planning for and delivering cos |
Appendix B. Acronyms, abbreviations and glossary
| Acronyms | |
|---|---|
| ARRB | Australian Road Research Board |
| LGPRF | Local Government Performance Reporting Framework |
| LGV | Local Government Victoria |
| RMP | road management plan |
| VAGO | Victorian Auditor-General’s Office |
Appendix A. Submissions and comments
We have consulted with Bendigo, Gannawarra, Maribyrnong, Northern Grampians, and Yarra Ranges, and we considered their views when reaching our audit conclusions. As required by the Audit Act 1994, we gave a draft copy of this report, or relevant extracts, to those agencies and asked for their submissions and comments.
Responsibility for the accuracy, fairness and balance of those comments rests solely with the agency head.
3. Delivery of road maintenance
Conclusion
Councils do not know whether they are achieving value for money in maintaining their road network. This is because they lack the data that would allow them to analyse or benchmark their performance. Even where data is available, councils do not use it to understand their efficiency.
The audited councils are not compliant with the timeliness standards in their RMPs for planned inspections and reactive maintenance. This exposes them to legal liability and risks reducing the quality of their roads over time.
2. Planning road maintenance
Conclusion
The audited councils are determining their planned road maintenance based on limited information, increasing the risk of waste or not meeting desired service levels.
All audited councils use asset data and budget information to plan for road maintenance. However, gaps and inaccuracies in road condition and cost data, and a lack of understanding of community expectations for service levels, significantly reduce councils’ evidence base for decision-making.
1. Audit context
Victoria has over 132 000 kilometres of local roads, making up 87 per cent of the state’s total road network.
Councils are responsible for maintaining these roads so that they are safe and functional.
Appendix F. Survey Data
This appendix contains detailed data from our survey. You can also view this on our data dashboard on our website at www.audit.vic.gov.au.
Prevalence of sexual harassment
FIGURE F1: Metropolitan council prevalence of sexual harassment
Appendix E. Survey methodology
We conducted a survey about sexual harassment in local government. Our survey asked about:
- individual experiences of sexual harassment
- why respondents did or did not complain
- sexual harassment policies and training
- views on council communication and prevention.
To help participating councils address sexual harassment, we shared their de identified results with their mayor and CEO.
Appendix D. Legislation, policy and guidance
FIGURE D1: Legislative framework
| Source | Type | Requirements/guidance |
|---|---|---|
|
Equal Opportunity Act 2010 |
Victorian legislation |
Makes it unlawful to sexually harass anyone in an employment situation. |
Appendix C. Scope of this audit
| Who we audited | What we assessed | What the audit cost |
|---|---|---|
|
We assessed whether councils: |