2. Our recommendations
We made 3 recommendations to address our findings. The relevant agencies have accepted the recommendations in principle.
| Agency response(s) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Department of Justice and Community Safety
| 1
| |||
We made 3 recommendations to address our findings. The relevant agencies have accepted the recommendations in principle.
| Agency response(s) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Department of Justice and Community Safety
| 1
| |||
Our audit followed 2 lines of inquiry:
1. Is Ravenhall delivering its rehabilitation and reintegration programs as required?
2. Is Ravenhall's rehabilitation and reintegration model contributing to reducing reoffending?
To answer these questions, we examined:
This section contains high-level case studies for performance measures in DH, DJCS and DFFH.
The case studies provide insight into whether these departments have achieved their performance targets between 2020–21 to 2024–25.
We looked at a range of quality, quantity and timeliness measures to reflect the diversity of government service delivery and to identify key issues and trends.
For detailed performance results, please see our dashboard.
Covered in this section:
We used data from our annual performance measure dashboard to look at departments’ service delivery performance between 2020–21 and 2024–25.
We looked at 282 performance measures in 34 outputs. From this selection, 101 measures did not have data for every year between 2020–21 to 2024–25.
Of the measures with data, departments met their targets every year in 28.2 per cent of performance measures. They missed their targets by a significant margin every year in 11.0 per cent of performance measures.
Covered in this section: