Appendix B. Acronyms and abbreviations
Acronyms | |
---|---|
ASSAM | SRIMS asset management module |
DFFH | Department of Families, Fairness and Housing |
DH | Department of Health |
DJCS | Department of Justice and Community Safety |
Acronyms | |
---|---|
ASSAM | SRIMS asset management module |
DFFH | Department of Families, Fairness and Housing |
DH | Department of Health |
DJCS | Department of Justice and Community Safety |
Figure D1 lists the actions that each agency is delivering or planning under the key strategies that we examined in the audit. It also shows which of the four aspects of major project resourcing they address. Figure D2 lists the members of the two IDCs.
FIGURE D1: Key strategies the audited agencies have underway or in draft to address delivery capability and capacity shortages, and the actions that each strategy includes
Who we audited | What we assessed | What the audit cost |
---|---|---|
|
We assessed how the agencies: |
Acronyms | |
---|---|
ANZSCO | Australian and New Zealand Standard Classification of Occupations |
DET | Department of Education and Training |
DJPR | Department of Jobs, Precincts and Regions |
DoT | Department of Transport |
All audited agencies have strategies and actions that target human and material resource shortages and risks. However, many of these actions are behind schedule and agencies do not know if they are effectively reducing delivery risks to the state’s infrastructure pipeline.
DTF, OPV, DoT, MTIA and DJPR have assessed the human and material resources needed to deliver the government's pipeline of major infrastructure projects. However, their assessments are not complete or accurate due to limitations and data gaps in the models they use. While all agencies can address many of their limitations―and OPV and DJPR have work underway to do this―significant gaps remain.